A change of paradigms in cancer prevention
1. The Celladam, as a possible alternative.
In our times one of the biggest medical challenges is to win over cancer. This problem is waiting to be solved.
Over the invested billions of dollars and the regularly announced declarations - without any significant result - there is no concrete breakthrough resultant of this work.
This challenge can be divided, somewhat arbitrarily, in three main areas:
1. Prevention
2. Diagnosis
3. Healing
As a matter of fact, oncology - hosting all cancer-related problems - does not care about prevention. It rather mixes the health preservation, lifestyle-improving and public health tasks. Yet we think that the most important risk factors of cancer are those coefficients which have influence on our daily life, i.e. common environmental harm, lifestyle, eating habits, hygiene etc. These factors outgrow the area that might be efficiently influenced through medical-professional means. Using the clinical studies useful advices can be given; therefore it is not allowed to rule out completely those means. The health professionals could use these experiences in an effective way if they have got a chance to do so.
But what can we do, if prevention does not work?
It is a well known and generally accepted fact that the chance of cancer healing depends on its recognition in time. The recognition in time in oncology practice is something very relative. In the early stage of the carcinomas there are generally no easily recognizable symptoms that could clearly show to the lay patient as well as to a doctor the evolution of the carcinoma. There is no pain. There are no signs like fever, headache or itch.
The present-day examinations including cancer screening are rather circumstantial and require instruments; hence, they are expensive, and because of that they are not generally available and are inadequate for screening. Add to this that for example biopsy /sampling/ is carcinogen per se. These methods are already applied in case of high suspicion, when the chance of early recognition is doubtful.
However, there are new techniques that go along sound lines. For example lung cancer diagnosis from breath, but these expand slowly, partially due to the counter-move by the orthodox trade. Their disadvantage lies in that they can only specifically recognize one single symptom.
What would happen if the disease could be diagnosed on time?
Let’s see what is called conventional methods of healing. Large parts of these should be discarded because their high inefficiency and because they are incompatible with the Hippocratic Oath. These are in the first place chemotherapy and radiotherapy, which cause more victims than cancer. If official statistics are acceptable, we can see that in case of women, Hungary goes first in the ranking of mortality due to cancer. Men get “only” the second place. In Europe, almost in every country, the number of cancerous patient is decreasing. In Hungary it is increasing: 30-35,000 dead, 60,000 new cases per year only in Hungary because of cancer.
Prevention is not agreeable, healing is pathetically inefficient. According to thoroughly controlled statistics there is a 50% survival rate, comprising patients who are in the first stage - so they have a big chance to survive - but also “nearly dead” people, who have reached the five year limit. That is what “survival” really means, to say nothing of those people whose cause of death was erroneously diagnosed. For example lung embolism, heart failure, etc.
According to some statistics, the odds of not attended patients - meaning those not treated with chemotherapy - are the same for patients treated with both chemotherapy and radiotherapy.
Looking at the inefficiency of healing, we can clearly see that important and fast results are attainable in two fields, i.e. prevention and recognition on time. It is evident that prevention will be the handy solution. Unfortunately it must be admitted that - in present-day circumstances - there is no realistic possibility considering factors like environmental pollution, conscious physical and moral corruption, ignorance, or the excessive human indiscretion. So what remains as a mandatory half-solution is the recognition on time and, as a consequence, a better chance to heal, perhaps detention or reversal of the disease’s progress.
The current clinical methods are not able to do this. Hence there is only one chance: if we find a method able to detect the early stage of cancer. That method must be economical and its technology easy to use. Also it has to give an adequate mark for multitudinous screening, monitoring. That does not mean a start of a possibly irreversible process.
But does any test method like that exist?
2. What is this method, practically speaking? How can a blood test provide us with any conclusion about the immune system?
The Celladam test - besides being economical, fast and exact, i.e. apt for multitudinous screening - is a methodical examination in prevention and healing of carcinomas. The test rests on a simple blood test and - following strictly determinative standards - a dehydration of blood serum drops.
With the microscope examination of the dehydrated blood serum drops it is possible to reach conclusions regarding the disorders of the tissues in the body. At the same time it warns regarding the balance of the immune system, which shows a direct consistency to the evolution of carcinomas. The result of the examination of the six blood serum drops is shown in a sophisticated triple-digit number. The first digit means the number of negative samples. The second digit means the positive number of samples. The totality of the first and second numbers must be six.
3. What is the theoretical root of the Celladam test?
The test speaks of a network that is responsible for the inter-cellular transport and information transport in the organism, where a flux of information takes place as an electronic charge. The Celladam test is able to figure out this network in vitro, that is, outside the body.
4. The Celladam test in practice. How does the sampling happen? How does the evaluation happen?
With the help of the Celladam screening, it is possible to monitor your health state and the status of your immune system. The test shows the stage of your immune system, but that does not definitely mean a carcinoma in your body. The process indicates the healthy status, with high sensibility.
The execution of the Celladam test takes place through several patents. The basic patent, which was accepted in Hungary (1984) and many other countries, has the registration number 191.105. Further patents: Nº 209.354 and 209.355.
The first time we reported the process at an international science congress was in 1984, in Alberta, Canada. From then onward the diagnostic test has been presented in several national and international conferences. Canada, England, France, Austria, Greece, Germany, Indonesia, United States of America.
We executed more than 16,000 analyses nearly in 20 health centers and on this basis, as well as the thousands of analysis since then we can affirm the following:
1. The test is reproducible, according to the reproducible studies. The result was 88.5 %.
2. The specificity of the process is very good: it shows the health state with the security of 90%.
3. The method has an increased sensibility on tumor infirmity.
4. The trace studies have undoubtedly confirmed that the repeated positive cases with no exception have justifiable complaints. Most of them have precancerous complaints in 75-80% of the cases.
5. The Celladam test is fast and easy. Its sensitivity permits to apply a preventive therapy.
After the successful investigations and experiments we do screenings since 1987 in Hungary.
To do the test we draw 1.5 ml blood intravenously. Then we evaluate with our method, in the course of which the dehydrated serum drops are analyzed through morpho-topological methods.
We can notify the patient of the result in a few days after the blood draw personally, by phone, e-mail or snail-mail.
1. Negative result: conserved, reasonable immune balance.
2. Unstable result: inconstant immune balance.
3. Border-line case: broken immune balance.
4. Positive result: failing immune balance.
In case of a positive or an unstable result we recommend Celladam cure and medical consultation.
